Immaculate
Conception and the 'Theology of the Body'
By
James H. Dobbins, Ph.D.
|
Summary: How the Immaculate Conception is the perfect embodiment
of the 'Theology of the Body'.
Keywords: Immaculate Conception, Blessed Virgin Mary, 'Theology of
the Body' |
The feast of the Immaculate Conception was
established by Pope Sixtus IV in 1476, but it was not until December 8,
1854, that Pope Pius IX issued his dogmatic declaration on the
Immaculate Conception, Ineffabilis Deus. In this document, long before
John Paul II provided us with his catechesis on the Theology of the
Body, we find the seeds of what would become key points in the major
work of John Paul II's pontificate.
In opening his chain of reasoning leading up to
his formal definition of this dogma, in which he cites the history of
belief in Mary's Immaculate Conception held by leaders throughout the
Church and throughout its long history, the Holy Father states,
"Therefore, far above all the angels and all the saints so wondrously
did God endow her with the abundance of all heavenly gifts poured from
the treasury of his divinity that this mother, ever absolutely free of
all stain of sin, all fair and perfect, would possess that fullness of
holy innocence and sanctity than which, under God, one cannot even
imagine anything greater, and which, outside of God, no mind can succeed
in comprehending fully."
Pius IX goes on to trace the historical view of
the dogma in the Church but also gives his reason why God determined it
was necessary to preserve Mary from Original Sin. "And indeed it was
wholly fitting that so wonderful a mother should be ever resplendent
with the glory of most sublime holiness and so completely free from all
taint of original sin that she would triumph utterly over the ancient
serpent. To her did the Father will to give his only-begotten Son-the
Son whom, equal to the Father and begotten by him, the Father loves from
his heart-and to give this Son in such a way that he would be the one
and the same common Son of God the Father and of the Blessed Virgin
Mary. It was she whom the Son himself chose to make his Mother and it
was from her that the Holy Spirit willed and brought it about that he
should be conceived and born from whom he himself proceeds....For it was
certainly not fitting that this vessel of election should be wounded by
the common injuries, since she, differing so much from the others, had
only nature in common with them, not sin. In fact, it was quite fitting
that, as the Only-Begotten has a Father in heaven, whom the Seraphim
extol as thrice holy, so he should have a Mother on earth who would
never be without the splendor of holiness." He continues later in the
document, "Hence, to demonstrate the original innocence and sanctity of
the Mother of God, not only did they [Church Fathers] frequently compare
her to Eve while yet a virgin, while yet innocence, while yet incorrupt,
while not yet deceived by the deadly snares of the most treacherous
serpent; but they have also exalted her above Eve with a wonderful
variety of expressions. Eve listened to the serpent with lamentable
consequences; she fell from original innocence and became his slave. The
most Blessed Virgin, on the contrary, ever increased her original gift,
and not only never lent an ear to the serpent, but by divinely given
power she utterly destroyed the force and dominion of the evil one."
In his catechesis, Theology of the Body, given as
a series of Wednesday audiences over a period of about four years, John
Paul II opens with the account in Matthew 19 where Jesus is teaching the
Pharisees about the indissolubility of marriage. He explains to them
that God's view of what marriage should be is still what it was "in the
beginning." The Holy Father continues with an in depth explanation of
the true nature of marriage in terms of its indissolubility, unity,
exclusivity, fidelity, and all the elements that constitute a true
marriage. He then continues in his teaching to introduce the concept of
the nuptial meaning of the body, which is a central anchor concept for
the rest of the catechesis. He teaches us, in audience number 15, "This
freedom lies at the basis of the nuptial meaning of the body. The human
body, with its [gender], and its masculinity and femininity seen in the very
mystery of creation, is not only a source of fruitfulness and
procreation, as in the whole natural order. It includes right from the
beginning the nuptial attribute, that is, the capacity of expressing
love, that love in which the person becomes a gift and—by means of this
gift—fulfills the meaning of his being and existence."
This teaching is essential, because John Paul II
will later compare the attributes of Adam and Eve being a gift to each
other to the condition of fallen man in Genesis 3 where their shame
signifies an awareness of the loss of innocence and the introduction of
fear, exemplified by the possibility of one person being an object to be
used by the other. The original innocence and original unity,
experienced and lived fully by Adam and Eve before the Fall,
characterized by their original nakedness which signified the absence of
fear and their ability to perceive the other interiorly as well as
exteriorly -- unable and unwilling to hide anything from each other and
having all faculties in harmony and under control of the spirit, was
manifested by the essential desire of each to be a gift. Each was gift
to the other without self-interest or reservation. Neither was taken or
dominated by the other.
After the Fall, not only did Adam and Eve lose
their original innocence, unity and gift of integrity, they were also
subject to concupiscence, fundamental interior disharmony, and a
diminished intellect, as well as a mortal body subject to disease, pain
and injury. The interior harmony they previously enjoyed was replaced by
a tendency to sin, especially envy, jealousy, lust, and pride.
As Satan watched Adam and Eve in the garden, he
understood what God had commanded them. He understood the nuptial
meaning of the body and that for Adam it meant he was to love Eve
unconditionally and serve her, as Jesus reminded the Pharisees, "For
this reason a man shall leave his father and mother and cling to his
wife." He knew Adam and Eve were giving themselves to each other as pure
gift, totally and completely, without reservation. He knew he had to get
to Eve before she and Adam could fulfill God's command to be fruitful
and multiply, because he wanted to destroy God's plan for all of
mankind, not just Adam and Eve, and he could not do that if she had
children first. God, on the other hand, also knew this and knew He had
to put Adam and Eve to the test just as He had put the angels to the
test, a test Lucifer (Satan) had failed miserably. So God withheld Eve's
pregnancy until they were tested. Adam and Eve, like Lucifer, failed the
test, but with a difference. They fell from grace but were not condemned
for eternity. Hope persisted in the promise given in Genesis 3:15.
All children born to Adam and Eve were born after
the Fall, and therefore inherited the nature their parents possessed
after the Fall, not the nature they had enjoyed in their original
innocence. The ability of all descendants of Adam and Eve to be a true
gift to each other was diminished and affected by their fallen nature.
Their inner disharmony and self-interest precluded them from being a
true gift, precluded them from experiencing the true nuptial meaning of
their body in relation to each other. They were deprived of original
innocence by the fall of Adam and Eve.
This condition remained, for Adam and Eve, for
their children, and continues to affect all of mankind to the present
day. But in His encounter with the Pharisees, Jesus is calling us back
toward that condition of original innocence, back to that standard for
marriage set by God. He is giving us the hope we need for true
redemption of the body, calling us to recognize the nuptial meaning of
our bodies and to live the meaning it represents. Jesus is telling us to
be a true gift to each other. But how close can we really get in our
fallen condition?
In audience 29, John Paul II explains, speaking of
the condition after the Fall, "But that simple and direct communion with
each other, connected with the original experience of reciprocal
nakedness, disappeared. Almost unexpectedly, an insuperable threshold
appeared in their consciousness. It limited the original giving of
oneself to the other, in full confidence in what constituted their own
identity and, at the same time, their diversity, female on the one side,
male on the other." In spite of this, Jesus gives us hope and calls us
to seek to regain, with His help, as much as possible, and to live, the
true nuptial meaning of our bodies our first parents enjoyed "in the
beginning."
We can now ask what the relationship is between
the Immaculate Conception and the Theology of the Body. Much of the
discussion on why Mary was immaculately preserved from Original Sin has
centered on the fact that she was to be the mother of God, and therefore
should be pure and free from sin to be worthy of that role. That is
true. But we must keep in mind that before she could become pregnant and
bear Our Lord, she had to first be the spouse of the Holy Spirit. She
had to be able to give herself to God, and do so freely, exclusively,
and without thought of self-interest, just as God would give Himself to
her. Her gift had to be a perfect gift fulfilling the true nuptial
meaning of the body. This meant the gift of herself to God, to be united
to God in such an intimate way, could not be tainted by a sinful,
inharmonious and fallen nature, which would have necessitated the
limitation of original giving of oneself that John Paul II speaks of in
audience 29. If her gift of herself to God was to be pure,
disinterested, exclusive, faithful, and complete, she had to be able to
give herself to God in a state of original innocence so their union
could be one of original unity for the kingdom of heaven in a way so
unique that it preserved her virginity while allowing her to become
pregnant. She had to participate in this union in a state of purity and
grace so profound that it could only happen if she was in a state of
original innocence, and that means she had to be in the state of being
Adam and Eve were in prior to the Fall. She had to be immaculate, and be
so from the moment of her conception. She had to be in a state never
touched by Original Sin.
God came to her and offered Himself, as He
explained through her encounter with Gabriel at the Annunciation, but He
also had to respect her as a person. He could not force her consent or
impose Himself upon her. He had to relate to her in total respect for
her personal integrity and in such a way that she and God would be pure
gift to each other. She, addressed by Gabriel with the title Full of
Grace, had to give her consent out of love for God without any
self-interest. This required that she, the new Eve, fully participate in
the original nuptial meaning of her body. She not only had to be able to
participate just as fully as Eve did with Adam before the Fall, she had
to be able to do more. Eve was unable to resist the temptation of Satan,
but Mary was to be the instrument of the destruction of Satan and
therefore could not be in a state of a weakened nature to any degree at
all. The force of Satan would be unleashed against her, as is clear from
the book of Revelation, just as it was against Jesus when He was tempted
during His 40 day fast following His baptism. Only in a state of
original innocence could she resist Satan as completely as she must.
Just as Jesus withstood His ordeal, so must Mary withstand her ordeal.
The redemption of mankind depended on her victory as it did on that of
Jesus.
Mary had a three-fold role, which continues today.
She was destined to be the spouse of the Holy Spirit, mother of God, and
destroyer, with her Son, of Satan. In addition, her motherly role would
eventually be extended to all of us as our Mother and protector ("Woman,
behold your son." Jn 19:26). She not only had to be able to offer the
nuptial gift of herself to God to assume her role as the Theotokos, the
God Bearer. She also had to be prepared by God to be the one who would
bring Satan down. One might ask why, since God could dispatch Satan so
easily. God has not given us His rationale, but we can certainly come to
some reasonable conclusions. God will not attack Satan one on one. It
would be no match since Satan must obey God even in his fallen state.
Satan's sin was rooted in pride, and victory over him, in justice, must
strike at the center of his pride. What more complete and just way could
Satan be defeated than to have a purely human, supremely humble, woman
be the instrument of his total defeat. It is interesting that in the
typical post-Vatican II scriptural translations of today, when we read
the protoevangelium in Genesis 3:15, it says "I will put enmity between
you and the woman, and between your seed and her seed; he shall bruise
your head, and you shall bruise his heel." But the Jerusalem Bible uses
the word "It" instead of He, and the footnote says that in the Greek
translation, "It" is rendered as He, but in the Latin translation "It"
is rendered as she, and notes that the Latin translation is the
prevailing translation in the Church. It certainly was prior to Vatican
II and was clearly reflected in the text of Ineffabilis Deus. However,
recognizing that with God there are no coincidences, one could say that
it is both Jesus and Mary who will crush the head of the Serpent, since
whatever Mary does is always done by the will of and through the power
given to her by God. She is His supreme instrument of good and dispenser
of grace...
To accomplish all this, to fulfill all three of
these roles, she was graced to be the epitome of the nuptial gift of her
body for the kingdom of God, as well as the epitome of the nuptial
mystery of femininity in her maternity as the mother of God. She lived,
and lives, the nuptial meaning of the body completely and perfectly, in
both of its aspects.
 Signature:
James H. Dobbins, Ph.D.
Author of Take My Hand, A Personal
Retreat Companion
E-Mail:
jhdphd(at)gmail(dot)com
Web: http://yorked.podomatic.com
Click Link Below To View:
Submit a Comment About this Article ('add post')
Read Comments Regarding this Article (if applicable)
Read Other
User-Submitted Articles
Submit Your Own
Article
More About User-Submitted Articles
Read User-Submitted Posts
Submit Your
Own Post
For Information Related To This Topic Try:
'Theology of the Body' (Q & A) [Guest Article]
Catholic Life Section
More Information / Resources:
Click Here For Help =>
10,000+ Topics!
Click Here
For Thousands of Quotations From Popes, Saints, Scripture, Etc.
Categorized By Section
Looking For a Great
Catholic Home Page? Try the MCS Daily Digest™ (click here)
Didn't find what you were looking for?
Try Here
We make no guarantees regarding any item herein. By using
this site you indicate agreement to all terms. For terms information,
see "Important Notice" above and click
here.
|
